Music

We Need to Protect Macklemore At All Costs

BYYassine Hariss

September 15, 2026

Macklemore continues to give us more reasons to love him. Throughout his career, the Seattle rapper, born Benjamin Hammond Haggerty, has made a habit of using his platform to draw attention to causes outside the usual orbit of celebrity concern. And in recent years, that instinct has made him one of the most prominent voices in mainstream music advocating for Palestinian rights.

The latest example came earlier this month at New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium, where he was opening for Ed Sheeran on his Loop Tour. Midway through his set, the 43-year-old stopped to address the crowd. He explained that playing venues this big gave him a platform to say something that mattered to him. Then came the two words: “Free Palestine.”

Predictably, the moment quickly caused a stir. Clips from the performance spread online, where pro-Israel advocacy group StopAntisemitism accused Macklemore of “ambushing” concertgoers with “anti-Israel propaganda.” P!NK amplified the criticism by reposting it to her Instagram story, prompting backlash of her own.

She later clarified via a lengthy statement that the post contained language she “wouldn’t have chosen” and said sharing someone else’s words had failed to properly communicate her position. P!NK stressed that she does not speak for Israel or any government, while adding that Palestinians “deserve a future that honors their humanity and their aspirations.” She also rejected the suggestion that she needed to “recite anybody’s slogan to earn back a follower.” Noticeably, however, the statement spent more time clarifying her own position than explaining what, precisely, she believed Macklemore had done wrong.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by P!NK (@pink)

By then, the controversy had moved well beyond Instagram. The Israeli American Council launched a petition calling for Macklemore to be removed from Sheeran’s remaining dates, while several stadiums due to host the Loop Tour reportedly said their shows would not go ahead with the rapper still on the bill. Faced with the prospect of cancellations, Macklemore was ultimately dropped from the eight remaining dates he had been scheduled to open.

And this is where things get interesting. According to Macklemore, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft—whose Kraft Group owns Gillette Stadium outside Boston—was instrumental in the pushback. In a statement shared after his removal, the rapper claimed that Sheeran told him Kraft had not only barred him from performing at Gillette, but had rallied other stadium owners around a fairly straightforward ultimatum: keep him on the tour, or their venues would no longer be available.

Macklemore, for his part, did not appear particularly devastated by how things turned out; quite the opposite. Reflecting on his two MetLife appearances after being dropped, he essentially argued that they had already served their purpose: he had wanted the opportunity to stand in front of some 90,000 people and say “Free Palestine,” and, well, he did.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by BEN (@macklemore)

And the response he has received since is quite something. Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammoud wasted little time offering Macklemore another stage, inviting him to perform in the Michigan city and proposing a free, city-sponsored concert to remind him, in rather practical terms, that he is far from alone.

Elsewhere, Palestinian photojournalist Motaz Azaiza sent his support, Irish rap trio Kneecap did the same, while Algerian model Younes Bendjima took a considerably less diplomatic approach, calling out Ed Sheeran directly.

Hey @macklemore, if they don’t want you performing in their stadiums, you’re always welcome in Dearborn.

Come put on a show here. We’ll make it a free concert, sponsored by the City, and help make it one of the best around.

We stand with you and for a free Palestine.

Let’s… https://t.co/Y9NnJT8HGn
— Abdullah H. Hammoud (@AHammoudMI) September 15, 2026

Throughout his career, Sheeran has largely cultivated the image of an artist who prefers to remain outside the political fray, however, that distance has not always been quite so absolute. In 2022, he performed at Concert for Ukraine, a televized fundraiser for the Disasters Emergency Committee’s humanitarian appeal that eventually managed to pump in hundreds of thousands for the cause.

Four-years-later, that precedent makes his silence here rather difficult not to notice. No one is suggesting that supporting Ukraine somehow contractually obliges Sheeran to speak on Palestine, nor that the two conflicts are interchangeable. But it does make the claim of political neutrality considerably harder to carry. Particularly when the person at the centre of this controversy is not some distant acquaintance, but a longtime friend whose position on Palestine could hardly have come as a surprise. Even more so when you come from a country like Sheeran’s (Ireland) whose history is so deeply entangled with Palestine in the first place, and whose government has remained one of Israel’s longstanding enemies.

God bless the internet and its memory https://t.co/hSDt2BZh5X
— Leyla Hamed (@leylahamed) September 14, 2026

If publicly standing with Ukrainians was neither too political nor too controversial, why does Palestine appear to require a different calculation? There is also the question of what Sheeran himself really stood to lose. With his fortune estimated in the millions of dollars, this is hardly an artist operating from a position of financial precarity.

These discrepancies become even stranger when you look elsewhere in the industry. Take Ye, for instance. The rapper formerly known as Kanye West has spent years embroiled in controversy over a well-documented string of antisemitic remarks and pro-Nazi rhetoric, at one point declaring his admiration for Hitler, selling T-shirts emblazoned with swastikas, and releasing a song titled, verbatim, Heil Hitler. And yet, earlier this month, Ye was still able to perform two back-to-back sold-out shows at Chicago’s Soldier Field, suggesting he’s not entirely unwelcome on some of America’s biggest stages.

Which makes Macklemore’s situation all the more difficult to ignore. One artist can spend years making remarks widely condemned as antisemitic and explicitly praise the ex-Nazi regime and still find stadiums willing to put his name on the line-up. Another says “Free Palestine” and suddenly venues are threatening to pull entire shows unless he disappears entirely.

There is something almost absurd about the fact that one of the loudest and most consistent voices advocating for Palestinians in mainstream music right now belongs to a white rapper from Seattle. Macklemore has every right to care, of course. The irony lies in how many artists with far closer ties to Palestine and the wider region have remained silent, spoken only when pressed, or struggled to say much of anything at all.

On Hind’s Hall, Macklemore asks a simple question: “What you willin’ to risk? What you willin’ to give?” Two years later, the question feels considerably less rhetorical. When speaking up eventually began costing him stages, access, and opportunities, he kept speaking anyway. And in an industry where conviction can become flexible the moment there are consequences attached, that counts for something.

We Need to Protect Macklemore At All Costs

Related Stories

More From Opinions

Newsletter

The only newsletter you won't unsubscribe from

Follow Us